Skip Navigation


ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil Advance Access originally published online on June 27, 2007
ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2007 64(6):1191-1201; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsm083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64/6/1191    most recent
fsm083v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Courbin, N.
Right arrow Articles by de Pontual, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Courbin, N.
Right arrow Articles by de Pontual, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Are hake otolith macrostructures randomly deposited? Insights from an unsupervised statistical and quantitative approach applied to Mediterranean hake otoliths

Nicolas Courbin1, Ronan Fablet2,, Capucine Mellon1 and Hélène de Pontual2

1 Ifremer, HMT, BP 171, 34203 Sète, France
2 Ifremer, Ifremer/STH/LASAA, BP 70, F–29280 Plouzané, France

Correspondence to R. Fablet: tel: +33 298 224388; fax: +33 298 224653; e-mail: Ronan.Fablet{at}ifremer.fr

Courbin, N., Fablet, R., Mellon, C., and de Pontual, H. 2007. Are hake otolith macrostructures randomly deposited? Insights from an unsupervised statistical and quantitative approach applied to Mediterranean hake otoliths. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 1191–1201.

Individual fish age data are crucial to fish stock assessment, so their accuracy and precision are vital. The acquisition of age data most often relies on interpreting fish otoliths, a complex task in which expert subjectivity increases with the complexity of the structural patterns of the otoliths. The question arises for certain fish species (e.g. hake, Merluccius merluccius) whether the deposition of otolith macrostructures is meaningful for age estimation. A quantitative method based on the evaluation of otolith similarity in terms of structural patterns is presented to investigate this issue. It relies on the determination of a typology of otolith macrostructures from an unsupervised statistical analysis of the distributions of their characteristics. This typology provides a basis for analysing and comparing structural patterns of otoliths through evaluation of structural otolith similarities. Application to a set of Mediterranean hake otoliths discriminates three types of macrostructure, one likely associated with fish responses to environmental or endogenous factors, and the other two meaningful at a population or group level. Comparisons of structural patterns based on the proposed structural similarity measure over two successive years support the assumption that otolith patterns are stable over time, although male and female otoliths differ significantly in structural pattern. The results bring new evidence that hake otolith patterns are not random and may be relevant to age estimation.

Keywords: age, age estimation method, growth, Merluccius merluccius, otolith, quality control

Received 4 December 2006; accepted 10 May 2007; advance access publication 27 June 2007.

Present address of N. Courbin: Département Biologie, Pavillon Alexandre-Vachon, Université Laval, Québec (QC), Canada G1K 7P4.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.