Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(9):1736-1750; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.07.004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrera, P.
Right arrow Articles by Uriarte, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carrera, P.
Right arrow Articles by Uriarte, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Comparison of airborne lidar with echosounders: a case study in the coastal Atlantic waters of southern Europe

P. Carreraa,*, J.H. Churnsideb, G. Boyrac, V. Marques, C. Scalabrind and A. Uriartee

a Museo do Mar de Galicia Avenida Atlántida 160, 36208 Vigo, Spain
b NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
c Fundación AZTI-AZTI Fundazioa Herrera Kaia, Portualdea, Z/G 20110 Pasaia, Spain
d IPIMAR, Avda de Brasilia 1400 Lisboa, Portugal
e IFREMER, Laboratoire de Sète 1 Rue Jean Vilar, 34203 Sète Cedex, France

*Correspondence to P. Carrera: tel: +34 986247750; fax: +34 98624748. e-mail: pablo.carrera{at}museodomar.com.

The feasibility of using airborne lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) was studied to assess the early juvenile fractions of the main pelagic fish species of the coastal Atlantic waters of southern Europe (anchovy, sardine, mackerel, and horse mackerel). Field comparisons with more established echosounder methods were undertaken in the summers of 1998 and 1999 during the recruitment period of sardine and anchovy in the selected areas, in the presence of a variety of oceanographic and environmental conditions. Backscattered energies as well as the types of target recorded by both devices were compared. The distributions of energies and the shape of the targets were generally similar for both techniques, with moderate numerical correlation between sensors, demonstrating the potential of lidar for assessment of anchovy, sardine, and juvenile mackerel. However, differences in received backscattering energy were found, especially in the presence of certain plankton assemblages (to which lidar is more sensitive) and isolated schools with large vertical dimensions (for which shadowing is more significant for light than sound). Experimental ad hoc optical reflectivity measurements of fish and plankton are proposed to discriminate these two types of targets. In addition, an improvement on lidar implementation and data processing is suggested to achieve fish abundance estimates.

Keywords: airborne lidar, anchovy, Bay of Biscay, echosounder, recruitment, sardine, West Iberian Peninsula

Received 31 March 2006; accepted 19 July 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. H. Churnside, E. Tenningen, and J. J. Wilson
Comparison of data-processing algorithms for the lidar detection of mackerel in the Norwegian Sea
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1023 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
C. Scalabrin, C. Marfia, and J. Boucher
How much fish is hidden in the surface and bottom acoustic blind zones?
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. H. Churnside and P. L. Donaghay
Thin scattering layers observed by airborne lidar
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2009; 66(4): 778 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.