Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2005 62(7):1394-1407; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.04.019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brodziak, J.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brodziak, J.
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Do environmental factors affect recruits per spawner anomalies of New England groundfish?

Jon Brodziak* and Loretta O'Brien

National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA

*Correspondence to J. Brodziak: tel: +1 508 495 2365; fax: +1 508 495 2393. e-mail: jon.brodziak{at}noaa.gov.

We evaluated the influence of environmental factors on recruits per spawner (RS) anomalies of 12 New England groundfish stocks. Nonparametric methods were used to analyse time-series of RS anomalies derived from stock-recruitment data in recent assessments. The 12 stocks occur in three geographic regions: the Gulf of Maine (cod Gadus morhua, redfish Sebastes fasciatus, winter flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus, American plaice Hippoglossoides platessoides, witch flounder Glyptocephalus cynoglossus, and yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea), Georges Bank (cod, haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus, and yellowtail flounder), and Southern New England (summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus, yellowtail flounder, and winter flounder). Randomization tests were applied to detect years when RS anomalies were unusually high or low for comparison with oceanographic conditions such as the 1998 intrusion of Labrador Subarctic Slope water into the Gulf of Maine region. Randomization methods were also used to evaluate the central tendency and dispersion of all RS anomalies across stocks. Average RS anomalies were significantly positive in 1987 across stocks and regions, indicating that environmental forcing was coherent and exceptional in that year. Responses of RS values of individual stocks to lagged and contemporaneous environmental variables such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index, water temperature, windstress, and shelf water volume anomalies were evaluated using generalized additive models. Overall, the NAO forward-lagged by 2 years had the largest impact on RS anomalies. This apparent effect is notable because it could provide a leading indicator of RS anomalies for some commercially exploited stocks. In particular, the three primary groundfish stocks on Georges Bank (cod, haddock, and yellowtail flounder) all exhibited positive RS anomalies when the NAO2 variable was positive.

Keywords: environmental forcing, generalized additive models, New England groundfish, North Atlantic Oscillation, randomization test, recruits per spawner, shelf water volume, water temperature, windstress

Received 29 June 2004; accepted 27 April 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. J. Pershing, C. H. Greene, J. W. Jossi, L. O'Brien, J. K.T. Brodziak, and B. A. Bailey
Interdecadal variability in the Gulf of Maine zooplankton community, with potential impacts on fish recruitment
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(7): 1511 - 1523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.