Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(7):1057-1061; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.06.005
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popper, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Higgs, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Popper, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Higgs, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Response of clupeid fish to ultrasound: a review

Arthur N. Poppera,*, Dennis T.T. Plachtab, David A. Mannc and Dennis Higgsd

a Department of Biology and Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA
b Institut für Biologie II, RWTH Aachen Kopernikusstr. 16, 52074 Aachen, Germany
c College of Marine Science, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
d Department of Biology, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, Canada N9B 3P4

*Correspondence to A. N. Popper: tel: +1 301 460 5599; fax: +1 301 314 9358. e-mail: apopper{at}umd.edu.

A number of species of clupeid fish, including blueback herring, American shad, and gulf menhaden, can detect and respond to ultrasonic sounds up to at least 180 kHz, whereas other clupeids, including bay anchovies and Spanish sardines, do not appear to detect sounds above about 4 kHz. Although the location for ultrasound detection has not been proven conclusively, there is a growing body of physiological, developmental, and anatomical evidence suggesting that one end organ of the inner ear, the utricle, is likely to be the detector. The utricle is a region of the inner ear that is very similar in all vertebrates studied to date, except for clupeid fish, where it is highly specialized. Behavioural studies of the responses of American shad to ultrasound demonstrate that they show a graded series of responses depending on the sound level and, to a lesser degree, on the frequency of the stimulus. Low-intensity stimuli elicit a non-directional movement of the fish, whereas somewhat higher sound levels elicit a directional movement away from the sound source. Still higher level sounds produce a "wild" chaotic movement of the fish. These responses do not occur until shad have developed the adult utricle that has a three-part sensory epithelium. We speculate that the response of the American shad (and, presumably, other clupeids that can detect ultrasound) to ultrasound evolved to help these species detect and avoid a major predator – echolocating cetaceans. As dolphins echolocate, the fish are able to hear the sound at over 100 m. If the dolphins detect the fish and come closer, the nature of the behavioural response of the fish changes in order to exploit different avoidance strategies and lower the chance of being eaten by the predators.

Keywords: ear, fish, hearing, threshold, ultrasound, utricle

Received 18 March 2003; accepted 1 April 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.