© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Different surveys provide similar pictures of trends in a marine fish community but not of individual fish populations
a Laboratoire MAERHA, IFREMER Rue de l'Ile d' Yeu, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes cedex 3, France
b Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory Lowestoft NR33 0HT, England, UK
*Correspondence to V. M. Trenkel: tel: +33 240 374053; fax: +33 240 374075. e-mail: verena.trenkel{at}ifremer.fr.
Choice of sampling method and survey period can have an important impact on the perception of the structure and dynamics of an ecological community. For the Celtic Sea fish assemblage we compared data obtained by three different trawl surveys: an autumn groundfish survey with a GOV trawl, and a spring and an autumn groundfish survey, both carried out with a Portuguese high-headline trawl. Time-series of abundance estimates were not consistent among surveys for all species and were generally very noisy. An analysis of variance components showed that the sampling method contributed more to the variance in abundance estimates compared to survey period, interannual variability, or even sampling variance. Overall community assessments based on indicators such as proportions of non-commercial and piscivorous species, and the proportion of benthic species showed similar trends for all data series. The shape of the size spectrum based on abundances per length class summed over all fish species, although stable over time, was highly sensitive to the sampling method. With the exception of size spectra, community indicators for marine fish assemblages monitored by surveys seem to be robust to survey period and trawling gear, but species abundance trends are method dependent.
Keywords: abundance, Celtic Sea, size spectrum, species diversity, survey, trawl
Received 21 July 2003; accepted 26 January 2004.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. H. Thygesen, K. D Farnsworth, K. H. Andersen, and J. E Beyer How optimal life history changes with the community size-spectrum Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2005; 272(1570): 1323 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Shin, M.-J. Rochet, S. Jennings, J. G. Field, and H. Gislason Using size-based indicators to evaluate the ecosystem effects of fishing ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 384 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Blanchard, N. K. Dulvy, S. Jennings, J. R. Ellis, J. K. Pinnegar, A. Tidd, and L. T. Kell Do climate and fishing influence size-based indicators of Celtic Sea fish community structure? ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 405 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Rochet, V. Trenkel, R. Bellail, F. Coppin, O. Le Pape, J.-C. Mahe, J. Morin, J.-C. Poulard, I. Schlaich, A. Souplet, et al. Combining indicator trends to assess ongoing changes in exploited fish communities: diagnostic of communities off the coasts of France ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(8): 1647 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

