Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(1):84-97; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.09.003
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, R. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Driscoll, R. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Estimating uncertainty associated with acoustic surveys of spawning hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) in Cook Strait, New Zealand

Richard L O'Driscoll*

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Private Bag 14-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand

*Correspondence to R. L. O'Driscoll; tel: +64 4 386 0300; fax: +64 4 386 0574. e-mail: r.odriscoll{at}niwa.co.nz.

Eleven acoustic surveys carried out between 1991 and 2002 provided estimates of the relative abundance of spawning hoki in Cook Strait, New Zealand. The precision and bias of each survey were estimated using a new Monte Carlo simulation method, which combined uncertainties associated with survey timing, sampling error, detectability, species composition, target strength, calibration coefficients, and missing strata. Because hoki have a long spawning season (more than 2 months) with turnover of fish in the survey area, survey timing was the most important source of uncertainty. Uncertainty was reduced by having a number of sub-surveys (snapshots) over a 4–6 week period, centred on the middle date of the spawning season. The other major source of uncertainty was the occurrence of 40–70% of hoki in mixed species: "hoki fuzz" marks. The acoustic analysis assumed all acoustic backscatter from hoki marks was hoki, so the presence of other species caused a positive bias in relative-abundance indices. The magnitude of this bias differed between years because the proportion of hoki in the "fuzz" marks was variable. There was additional uncertainty from the variability in the species composition of mixed marks that affected survey precision. The abundance indices were corrected for estimated bias, and the estimate of precision, expressed as the coefficient of variation or c.v., was applied to weight the results from each acoustic survey in the assessment model used to set commercial-catch limits.

Keywords: acoustic survey, hoki, Monte Carlo, target strength

Received 31 March 2003; accepted 14 September 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
M. Woillez, J. Rivoirard, and P. G. Fernandes
Evaluating the uncertainty of abundance estimates from acoustic surveys using geostatistical simulations
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1377 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. Loland, M. Aldrin, E. Ona, V. Hjellvik, and J. C. Holst
Estimating and decomposing total uncertainty for survey-based abundance estimates of Norwegian spring-spawning herring
ICES J. Mar. Sci., October 1, 2007; 64(7): 1302 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.