Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2003 60(6):1298-1317; doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00124-3
© 2003 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benoít, H. P
Right arrow Articles by Swain, D. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benoít, H. P
Right arrow Articles by Swain, D. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Accounting for length- and depth-dependent diel variation in catchability of fish and invertebrates in an annual bottom-trawl survey

Hugues P Benoít* and Douglas P Swain

Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Centre 343 Avenue Université, PO Box 5030, Moncton, NB E1C 9B6, Canada

*Correspondence to H. P. Benoít; tel: +1 506 851 3146; fax: +1 506 851 2620. e-mail: benoith{at}dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

Diel variation in the catchability of 51 species of fish and 13 invertebrate taxa from an annual bottom-trawl survey of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence was examined using generalized linear (Poisson) models. Two approaches were used: comparative fishing based on spatially paired day and night tows, and statistical control of spatio-temporal effects in regular survey data. The two approaches provided remarkably similar results. Furthermore, species-specific results were consistent between survey time periods where different vessels were used, and were quite comparable to results from other studies conducted in separate geographic areas. Where sufficient data existed, we considered both length and depth dependencies in diel variation in catchability. We commonly found significant length dependency for groundfish species and the pervasive pattern was for higher nighttime catches of small fish, the magnitude of the effect generally decreasing with increasing length. In contrast, water depth had a much less important impact, except for a few species. When considered jointly, however, patterns in length/depth dependency were not always clear. Given length-dependent geographic and bathymetric patterns in species distribution, the potential for confounding length and depth dependencies exists and correction factors for diel variation in catchability need to be applied cautiously.

Keywords: diel variation in catchability, depth-dependent, length-dependent, trawl survey

Received 6 September 2002; accepted 7 May 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
N. Bahamon, F. Sarda, and J. Aguzzi
Fuzzy diel patterns in catchability of deep-water species on the continental margin
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2009; 66(10): 2211 - 2218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
G. J. Piet, R. van Hal, and S. P. R. Greenstreet
Modelling the direct impact of bottom trawling on the North Sea fish community to derive estimates of fishing mortality for non-target fish species
ICES J. Mar. Sci., October 1, 2009; 66(9): 1985 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
H. M. Fraser, S. P. R. Greenstreet, and G. J. Piet
Taking account of catchability in groundfish survey trawls: implications for estimating demersal fish biomass
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2007; 64(9): 1800 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.