Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2001 58(1):172-182; doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.1000
© 2001 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kristiansen, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huse, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kristiansen, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Huse, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Optimal selection of temperature areas by juvenile cod (Gadus morhua L.) in the Barents Sea modelled by dynamic optimisation

Tore S. Kristiansena,, Kathrine Michalsena, Jan Arge Jacobsenb and Irene Husea

a Institute of Marine Research P.O. Box 1870, N-5817, Bergen, Norway
b Fisheries Laboratory of the Faeroe Islands P.O. Box 3051, Noatun, FO-110, Torshavn, Faroe Islands

Correspondence to T. S. Kristiansen: tel: (+47) 55 23 68 97; fax: (+47) 55 23 63 79; e-mail: tore.kristiansen{at}imr.no

The trade-off between growth rate in areas with different temperatures and predation rates was modelled for juvenile cod living in the Barents Sea by a dynamic optimisation model. The choice of optimal temperature area of a juvenile (1-group) cod growing from a start weight (50 g, 15 cm) to a size refuge (640 g, 40 cm) was modelled for two scenarios with distributions of predators (4+ groups cod) similar to those observed in the Barents Sea in February 1990 and 1994, respectively, and without food limitations. The model predicted that when there was an overlap in distribution between large cod and younger cod (0–3 group), the younger year classes would move to areas with lower temperature and less predators, offering higher survival rates. Fish predators forced the prey to inhabit less optimal areas, and both growth and survival rates fell in comparison with a scenario with fewer fish predators (cannibals) and less overlap. Increased fish predator density increased these effects, and the juveniles would stay in colder water for a longer period and their growth rate would be further reduced. Higher mortality, independent of area and size, made it more profitable to stay in warmer water, leading to higher growth but increased mortality rates.

Keywords: cod, dynamic modelling, predation risk, growth, survival

Received ; accepted 29 August 2000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.