Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2005 62(7):1436-1443; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.04.017
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poulard, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Poulard, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

The impact of climate change on the fish community structure of the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay

Jean-Charles Poularda,* and Fabian Blanchardb

a IFREMER, Département Ecologie et Modéles pour l'Halieutique Rue de l'Ile d'Yeu, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes Cedex 3, France
b IFREMER, Département Sciences et Technologies Halieutiques BP 70, 29280 Plouzané Cedex, France

*Correspondence to J-C. Poulard: tel: +33 2 40 37 41 08; fax: +33 2 40 37 40 75. e-mail: jean.charles.poulard{at}ifremer.fr.

Many fish species are at the southern or northern limit of their distribution range in the Bay of Biscay, where large-scale hydroclimatic changes have occurred in recent decades. We attempt here to identify the impact of these changes on the fish community of the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay. Data collected during 14 autumn groundfish surveys in 1973 and from 1987 to 2002 are used. The study area is between latitudes 48°30'N and 43°30'N while the depth ranges from 15 to 200 m. Annual abundance indices (number of individuals per km2) of 56 fish taxa present on average in at least 5% of the tows are computed. Multivariate analysis is used to detect temporal trends in these species' abundance indices. Assuming that increased water temperature may favour subtropical species and hinder temperate ones, knowledge about the latitudinal distribution range is used to interpret time trends. Results show an increasing abundance trend with time for fish species having a wide distribution range in latitude (mainly subtropical ones), whereas the abundance of temperate and the least widely distributed species decreased steadily.

Keywords: Bay of Biscay, climate change, fish community, groundfish surveys

Received 29 June 2004; accepted 27 April 2005.


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Large-scale changes in the biogeography of calanoid copepods have been reported for the eastern North Atlantic and European shelf seas (Beaugrand et al., 2002). Strong biogeographical shifts in all copepod assemblages have occurred with a northward extension of warm-water species associated with a decrease in the number of colder-water species. These biogeographical shifts were related to increasing trends in both northern hemisphere temperature and the North Atlantic Oscillation.

Northward extensions in the distribution of tropical fish species in East Atlantic waters have been recorded (Quéro, 1998). Further evidence was provided that warming of the North Atlantic is responsible for the northward extensions of the ranges of warm-water fish species, causing increasing numbers of southern immigrant species to appear off the Cornish coast of the UK (Stebbing et al., 2002).

The existence of a long-term increasing trend in sea surface temperature (a mean rise of 1.4°C for the period 1972–1993) was confirmed for the southeastern part of the Bay of Biscay (Koutsikopoulos et al., 1998). Reviewing the multi-decadal variations of three key regional climate and hydrological factors (sea surface temperature, windspeed, and river run-off), Planque et al. (2003) showed that the 1990s were characterized by warmer temperature (up to 0.6°C increase per decade from 1971 to 1998 in the southern part of the Bay) and windier conditions than the previous century. Désaunay et al. (in press) demonstrated that although the increase of sea temperature is lower in the northern part of the Bay of Biscay, a significant warming of winter temperatures occurred.

The eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay is part of the subtropical/boreal transition subprovince of the biogeographic Lusitanian province (OSPAR Commission, 2000). The fauna in this area are mixed with groups of boreal and subtropical origin and many fish species reach the southern or northern limit of their distribution in the Bay of Biscay.

Community studies in regions of overlapping "polar" and "temperate" species base the conclusion of climate change impacts on the differential response of these two categories to warming conditions (Parmesan and Yohe, 2003). Polar species tend to be stable or decline in abundance, whereas temperate species at the same site increase in abundance and/or expand their distributions.

In this study, we use this approach to identify the impact on the fish community of warming in the Bay of Biscay. For this, data provided on 56 fish taxa by groundfish surveys carried out in 1973 and during the period 1987–2002 were analysed. Previous work (Poulard et al., 2003) showed the relative stability through time of the spatial demersal fish community organization. Thus, we have chosen to focus the present study on temporal variations.


    Material
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Data were first collected during a groundfish survey carried out in November and December 1973 on the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay (Quéro et al., 1989). Data were also provided by 13 groundfish surveys carried out by IFREMER since 1987 (EVHOE series with gaps in 1991, 1993, and 1996) in the same area from October to December (ICES, 1997; Souissi et al., 2001; Poulard et al., 2003). The sampling design was stratified according to latitude and depth. A 36/47 GOV trawl was used with a 20 mm mesh codend liner. Haul duration was 30 min at a towing speed of 4 knots. Fishing was mainly restricted to daylight. Catch weights and catch numbers were recorded for all species; all finfish were measured from 1992, while length compositions of a selection of them were recorded prior to 1992.

The study area was restricted in latitude (between 48°30'N and 43°30'N) and depth range (from 15 to 200 m) to the area sampled in 1973 (Figure 1). The number of hauls per survey varied from 56 to 154. Overall 1279 hauls were analysed. In all, 168 were caught, but only 56 fish taxa, present on average in at least 5% of the tows, were included in the analysis.


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Area of the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay studied during the 14 groundfish surveys carried out by IFREMER from October to December, in 1973, from 1987 to 1990, in 1992, 1994, 1995 and from 1997 to 2002.

 

    Methods
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mean catch per tow was computed per species and per year accounting for the stratified sampling design. Annual abundance indices were then normalized to maximum species-specific numerical abundance. The chosen normalization allows the same weight to be assigned to each species in the following multivariate analysis. This objective is not achieved by using a log-transformation of the data. Standardized annual abundance indices were used as input in a correspondence analysis (Lebart et al., 1984) to detect time trends in the fish abundance indices. The variables (columns) were the years and the profiles (rows) were the species.

Latitudinal distribution ranges of species were used to interpret the temporal trends. The latitudinal range and its midpoint have been defined for each species considering the most northern and southern latitudes reported in the literature (Whitehead et al., 1986; Froese and Pauly, 2004). Latitude ranges and mean latitudes of species distributions were transformed into nominal variables by creating four equiprobable categories. This additional information is used as supplementary (or illustrative) variables that are projected into the space of the data but are not used to compute the factors of the correspondence analysis.

Overall mean length, weighted by species abundance, was computed per year from the species mean length in the survey of the year. Prior to 1992, when data on length were missing, the species mean length, computed over the available years, was used.

The species trophic levels used were those provided by Pinnegar et al. (2002) for the Celtic Sea, complemented by Fishbase (Froese and Pauly, 2004). The overall mean trophic level, weighted by species abundance, was computed per year.

A locally weighted regression smoother (Cleveland, 1979) was fitted to the survey species biomass for visualizing trends, and the associated 95% confidence limits were also computed. LOESS (local regression) is a method for smoothing a scatterplot ((xi, yi) with i = 1, ..., n). To fit a value at xk, a window is placed about xk; data points that lie inside the window are weighted so that nearby points get the most weight and a robust weighted regression is used to predict the value xk (Venables and Ripley, 1994). To test for significant long-term trends in survey data, non-parametric Mann–Kendall tests were performed (Gilbert, 1987). Differences were judged significant when p < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The first two axes of the correspondence analysis account for 35% of the total variance. The first axis divides the study period into two parts (Figure 2): the years from 1973 to 1995 have positive coordinates on this axis, while those from 1997 to 2002 have negative ones. This contrast between years indicates that two main opposite trends can be identified in the species abundance indices. Species located on the right side of the first axis show a declining trend over the study period, while species having negative coordinates on the first axis exhibit an increasing trend (Figure 3).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Correspondence analysis, projection of the 14 active variables ({diamondsuit} years), two illustrative variables (• mean latitude category of species latitude distribution, {blacksquare} range category of species latitude distribution), and the 56 individuals ({triangleup} species) in the principal plane (first and second axes plane). Symbol size is proportional to the contribution of years or species to the building of axes.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Examples of distribution of standardized abundance indices for species having negative (Echiichthys vipera) or positive (Molva molva) coordinates on the first axis of the correspondence analysis (see Figure 2).

 
The second axis takes into account the changes in the species abundance indices occurring mainly between 1997 and 2002. The second axis is particularly explained by species like Engraulis encrasicolus and Scomber japonicus, which had high abundance indices in 1997 and low ones in 2001 and 2002.

The two extreme categories of the illustrative variable "species range" (i.e. wide range and narrow range, Figure 2) and those of the illustrative variable "mean latitude" (i.e. low mean latitude and high mean latitude, Figure 2) have significant coordinates on the first axis.

Two species groups can be identified from the species abundance trends observed over the study period. First, abundance indices declined or fluctuated for 20 species (group A). More than one-third of these species had a narrow range in latitude distribution and a high mean latitude distribution (Table 1). Second, abundance indices increased for 36 species (group B). One-third of these species had a wide range in latitude distribution and a low latitude distribution mean.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Composition of the two species groups identified from the correspondence analysis (CA) results according to the two nominal variables: mean latitude and species range. Number of species per species group, per category of latitude range and of mean latitude. The categories are those used in the CA, except that the two middle ones for each variable were pooled.

 
Changes in biomass over years for the two groups of species are illustrated in Figure 4. The biomass of group A is especially variable from one year to another and does not exhibit any trends over the study period. On the contrary, the biomass of group B shows an increasing trend from 1987 to 2002 (Mann–Kendall S = 52, p < 0.0001), even when the less precise values of the years 1999 and 2002 are not considered (Mann–Kendall S = 39, p = 0.002).


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Evolution of the biomass of the two species groups identified from their coordinates on axis 1 of the correspondence analysis. Species group A includes a significant proportion of species with a narrow distribution range in latitude and a high mean latitude distribution. Species group B includes a significant proportion of species with a wide distribution range in latitude and a low mean latitude distribution.

 
The biomass was computed per species range category given in Table 1. For the species of group A, the biomass of the narrowest range and the most northern species (species range category 1) declined significantly from 1987 to 2002 (Mann–Kendall S = –42, p = 0.01; Figure 5a). There was no significant trend for the other species range categories. The main species contributing to about 90% of the biomass of the group in 1973 and during the period 1987–2002 are listed in Table 2. Blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) replaced poor cod (Trisopterus minutus) as a dominant species throughout the period 1987–2002, and hake (Merluccius merluccius) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) lost their second and fourth ranks, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Dominant species per group during the groundfish surveys carried out in 1973 and over the period 1987–2002 on the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay. Two species of horse mackerel have been caught (Trachurus trachurus, the bulk of the catch, and T. mediterraneus) but due to mistakes in the allocation to species in the recent surveys they were pooled.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 Biomass of the two species groups identified from their coordinates on axis 1 of the correspondence analysis (see Figure 4) broken down per species range category.

 
In species group B, both species range categories 2 and 3 increased significantly from 1987 to 2002 (Mann–Kendall S = 52, p < 0.0001 and S = 40, p = 0.01, respectively; Figure 5b). Although horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.) remained at the first rank, there were several changes at the lower levels (Table 2). The three benthic species, red gurnard (Chelidonichthys cuculus), anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius), and cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) present within the first five ranks in 1973, were replaced by a small demersal species, boarfish (Capros aper), and two pelagic species, mackerel (Scomber scombrus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus), during the period 1987–2002.

The mean length of species group A (Figure 6) declined steadily from 1987 to 1990 and exhibited an increasing trend later (Mann–Kendall S = 20, p = 0.044). The mean length of species group B decreased sharply from 1990 to 1994 and, although variable, remained at a low level during the following years.


Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6 Mean lengths of the two species groups identified from their abundance trends in groundfish surveys over the period 1973–2002.

 
The mean trophic level of species group A (Figure 7) declined significantly from 1973 to 2002 (Mann–Kendall S = –45, p = 0.01). The main change occurred between 1973 and the period 1987–2002 and was caused by the relative biomass increase of the blue whiting feeding at a low trophic level. The mean trophic level of species group B (Figure 7) was rather stable until 1992 and became especially variable afterwards. Its decline in some years was largely due to increased catches of boarfish which feeds at a lower trophic level than the other species occupying the first five ranks of the species group B (Table 2).


Figure 7
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7 Patterns of change in mean trophic level for the two species groups identified from their abundance trends in groundfish surveys over the period 1973–2002.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the group of species showing a declining trend of their abundance indices, seven (i.e. about one-third of the group) have a northerly distribution and a narrow latitude distribution range. The biomass of these boreal species declined during the study period, whereas the total biomass of other species (mainly transition species) varied from one year to another without trend.

Twelve species (i.e. one-third of the species) of the group exhibiting an increasing trend of their abundance indices are characterized by a southern distribution and wide species range. The biomass of these subtropical species increased from 1987 to 2002, like the biomass of transition species.

The decrease of the mean length of the "boreal" species group (A) between 1987 and 1990 was related to the decline in biomass of the transition species (range category 2; Figure 5a). Recruitment of several species (silvery pout Gadiculus argenteus, poor cod, bib Trisopterus luscus, hake, and blue whiting) increased sometimes at the same moment during the period 1990–1995, which also facilitated the lowering of the mean length of group A. Its following increase was mainly due to continuous weaker recruitment. The sharp decrease in mean length of "subtropical" species group (B) was due to an increase in the abundance of small fish species (e.g. boarfish, Mann–Kendall S = 59, p < 0.0001; imperial scaldfish Arnoglossus imperialis, Mann–Kendall S = 59, p < 0.0001) combined with an increase of the recruitment of some other species (e.g. wedge sole Dicologlossa cuneata, Mann–Kendall S = 45, p = 0.01).

In the absence of time-series isotope data from the study area, we obtained our trophic level values from the literature. For most of the fish species, the diet may vary according to length. Therefore, the values used were probably not the most suitable, given potential differences in length compositions between the Celtic Sea and our study area. For instance, the horse mackerel trophic level was calculated for fish having a mean length of 347 mm (Pinnegar et al., 2002), while the mean length of horse mackerel in our surveys was 172 mm. We also assume that species trophic levels are stable from year to year. Nevertheless, there are some indications that trophic levels of both species groups have decreased in recent years (the lowest values of both groups were recorded in 2000). Warm-water species seem to be responsible for the decrease of individual size and trophic level in the fish community. Our results point to a causal link between the observed changes in the fish community of the eastern shelf of the Bay of Biscay and ocean warming.

Records of rare tropical fish on the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay are not recent, although their number has increased since 1980, mainly in the southern part of the area (Quero et al., 1998). Likewise, the climate-induced changes in the abundance of four common flatfish species were demonstrated for the Vilaine estuary and the Bay of Biscay (Désaunay et al., in press).

Changes occurring in the fish community are not important enough to have had an effect on the spatial organization level of the demersal fish community (Poulard et al., 2003) even if there is positive correlation between the species abundance indices and the species occurrences in the catches of the same survey (correlation equal or greater than 0.5 for nine surveys out of 14, results not shown). This means that the spatial distribution of a species usually increases when its abundance increases, and the converse is usually also true.

Causal attribution of recent biological trends to climate change is complicated because non-climatic influences dominate local short-term biological changes (Parmesan and Yohe, 2003). Changes which have occurred in species composition and trophic level of the "boreal" species group (A) after 1973 could be attributed to fishing (Pauly et al., 2001). Indeed, hake, bib, and whiting contribute significantly to the French landings of demersal fish species coming from the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay (Poulard and Léauté, 2002). Part of their diet consists mainly of fish. Also, a release from predation may occur and account for an increase in dominance of smaller/lower trophic level species. The predation release will interact with climate warming, favour subtropical species, and is thought to have a major impact on low trophic level pelagic fish abundances (Pinnegar et al., 2002).

There were changes in the sampling procedure of the groundfish surveys and, above all, trawling operations were carried out with a new research vessel from 1997 onwards (Poulard et al., 2003). Unfortunately, there was no intercalibration experiment between the two research survey vessels in the Bay of Biscay. Conversion coefficients were available for some species from experiments carried out in the North Sea and the Celtic Sea (Pelletier, 1998). Generally, using these coefficients did not modify the observed species trends and sometimes reinforced them. In fact, most of the changes in the species abundance indices took place around 1994–1995 when the old research vessel was still being used. The position of the year 1995 on the first axis of the AFC (Figure 2) supports this interpretation.

This study does not establish a strong relationship between climate warming and changes in the fish community of the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay. However, we bring together a body of proof indicating that some climate-induced changes may have occurred, which could have been amplified by fishing.


    Acknowledgements
 
We wish to thank Jae Choi and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this work, and to Verena Trenkel who gave us linguistic advice.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Material
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    Beaugrand G., Reid P.C., Ibanez F., Lindley J.A. (2002) Reorganization of North Atlantic marine copepod biodiversity and climate. Science 296:1692–1694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    Cleveland W.S. (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:829–836.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Désaunay Y., Guérault D., Le Pape O., Poulard J-C. Changes in occurrence and abundance of northern/southern flatfishes over a 20-year period in a coastal nursery area (Bay of Vilaine) and on the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay. Scientia Marina in press.

    Fishbase (2004) http://www.fishbase.org version (04/2004).

    Gilbert R.O. (1987) Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring(Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY) 319 pp.

    ICES. (1997) Report of the International Bottom Trawl Survey Working Group. CM 1997/H: 6. 50 pp.

    Koutsikopoulos C., Beillois P., Leroy C., Taillefer F. (1998) Temporal trends and spatial structures of the sea surface temperature in the Bay of Biscay. Oceanologica Acta 21:335–344.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Lebart L., Morineau A., Warwick K.M. (1984) Multivariate Descriptive Statistical Analysis. Correspondence Analysis Related Techniques for Large Matrices(John Wiley & Sons, New York) 231 pp.

    OSPAR Commission. (2000) Quality Status Report 2000: Region IV – Bay of Biscay and IberianOSPAR Commission 134 + xiii pp.

    Parmesan C. and Yohe G. (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42.[CrossRef][Medline]

    Pauly D., Palomares M.L., Froese R., Sa-a P., Vakily M., Preikshot D., Wallace S. (2001) Fishing down Canadian aquatic food webs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:51–62.

    Pelletier D. (1998) Intercalibration of research survey vessels in fisheries: a review and an application. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:2672–2690.

    Pinnegar J.K., Jennings S., O'Brien C.M., Polunin N.C.V. (2002) Long-term changes in the trophic level of the Celtic Sea fish community and fish market price distribution. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:377–390.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Planque B., Beillois P., Jégou A-M., Lazure P., Petitgas P., Puillat I. (2003) Large-scale hydroclimatic variability in the Bay of Biscay: the 1990s in the context of interdecadal changes. ICES Marine Science Symposia 219:61–70.

    Poulard J-C., Blanchard F., Boucher J., Souissi S. (2003) Variability in the demersal fish assemblages of the Bay of Biscay during the 1990s. ICES Marine Science Symposia 219:411–414.

    Poulard J-C. and Léauté J-P. (2002) Interaction between marine populations and fishing activities: temporal patterns of landings of La Rochelle trawlers in the Bay of Biscay. Aquatic Living Resources 15:197–210.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Quéro J-C. (1998) Changes in the Euro-Atlantic fish species composition resulting from fishing and ocean warming. Italian Journal of Zoology 65:493–499.

    Quéro J-C., Dardignac J., Vayne J-J. (1989) Les poissons du Golfe de Gascogne(Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer – Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, France) 229 pp.

    Quéro J-C., Du Buit M-H., Vayne J-J. (1998) Les observations de poissons tropicaux et le réchauffement des eaux dans l'Atlantique européen. Oceanologica Acta 21:345–351.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Souissi S., Ibanez F., Ben Hamadou R., Boucher J., Cathelineau A.C., Blanchard F., Poulard J-C. (2001) A new multivariate mapping method for studying species assemblages and their habitats: example using bottom trawl surveys in the Bay of Biscay (France). Sarsia 86:527–542.[Web of Science]

    Stebbing A.R.D., Turk S.M.T., Wheeler A., Clarke K.R. (2002) Immigration of southern fish species to south-west England linked to warming of the North Atlantic (1960–2001). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 82:177–180.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

    Venables W.N. and Ripley B.D. (1994) Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus, Statistics and Computing(Springer-Verlag, New York) 462 pp.

    Whitehead P.J.P., Bauchot M.L., Hureau J.C., Nielsen J., Tortonese E. (1986) Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean(UNESCO, Paris) 1473 pp.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
R. B Wynn, S. A Josey, A. P Martin, D. G Johns, and P. Yesou
Climate-driven range expansion of a critically endangered top predator in northeast Atlantic waters
Biol Lett, October 22, 2007; 3(5): 529 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
M. Woillez, J.-C. Poulard, J. Rivoirard, P. Petitgas, and N. Bez
Indices for capturing spatial patterns and their evolution in time, with application to European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Bay of Biscay
ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2007; 64(3): 537 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poulard, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Poulard, J.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Blanchard, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?