ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(1):157-158; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.12.003
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Reconciling theoretical versus empirical target strengths of krill: effects of phase variability on the distorted-wave Born approximation
Southwest Fisheries Science Center 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
*Correspondence to D. A. Demer: tel: +1 858 546 5603; fax: +1 858 546 5608. e-mail: david.demer{at}noaa.gov.
In the caption for Figure 5, it was erroneously stated that the TS curves were normalized to L = 31.6 mm. They were normalized to L = 38.35 mm. Also, in the computations for Figure 5, the 100 realizations of TSSDWBA were too large, by a factor of 4
, and were averaged in the logarithmic domain. In the revised computations and figure, the 100 realizations of TSSDWBA have been averaged in the linear domain, and the 4
error was corrected. Cascading from these corrections, the TSSDWBA TSDWBA curve has been decreased by approximately 11 dB; the curve fit is
TS = 0.01414f 1.02044 dB; and the expected values (E[TSSDWBA(f)]) are approximately 15.4, 7.5, and 7.9 dB different from the deterministic Greene et al. model predictions at 38, 120, and 200 kHz, respectively. The revised Figure 5 is printed overleaf.
|
In the Conclusions section on p. 433, the second-from-last line should read:
Although the SDWBA model is probabilistic and therefore predicts TS within a range of about 8 dB (E[TSSDWBA(f)] ± 1 s.d.), the expected values (E[TSSDWBA(f)]) are approximately 15.4, 7.5, and 7.9 dB different from the deterministic Greene et al. model predictions at 38, 120, and 200 kHz, respectively (typical survey frequencies).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

= N(45.3°, 30.4°). (b) Differences between the SDWBA and DWBA models are also shown. For rapid computations of E[TSSDWBA(f)] below 210 kHz, the linear approximation for the differences between the probabilistic SDWBA model and the deterministic DWBA model is