Skip Navigation


ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil Advance Access originally published online on July 19, 2008
ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2008 65(7):1227-1234; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
65/7/1227    most recent
fsn115v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horbowy, J.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horbowy, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sensitivity of predicted cohort size and catches to errors in estimates of fishing mortality in the terminal year

Jan Horbowy

Sea Fisheries Institute, Kollataja 1, 81-332 Gdynia, Poland

tel: +48 58 73 56 267; fax: +48 58 73 56 110; e-mail: horbowy{at}mir.gdynia.pl

Horbowy, J. 2008. Sensitivity of predicted cohort size and catches to errors in estimates of fishing mortality in the terminal year. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 1227–1234.

Formulae for the sensitivity of projected cohort size and catches to errors (bias) in estimates of fishing mortality in the terminal year were developed. Assessment models allowing for random errors in the observed catches as well as models in which catches are treated as exact were considered. The formulae were applied to a Gulf of Riga (Baltic Sea) herring assessment to show how well they estimated prediction errors and to evaluate the effect of assessment errors on predictions. The errors propagate quickly with time, and the higher the fishing mortality, the bigger the projection error. The errors in predicted catches are somewhat lower than the errors in predicted cohort sizes. The formulae developed show that with moderate error in estimated fishing mortality (20%), the errors in predicted cohort size can reach 100%, and the errors in predicted catches may be 50% for fishing mortality estimated at 1.0 in the terminal year and the status quo prediction. As the Gulf of Riga herring case demonstrates, the overall error in predicted stock size and catches may be lower when terminal fishing mortality is underestimated at some ages and overestimated at others (cancelling effect).

Keywords: error, prediction, sensitivity, stock assessment

Received 5 December 2007; accepted 8 June 2008; advance access publication 19 July 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.