Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2009 66(4):720-733; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsp065
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Manson, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Griffiths, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Manson, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Temporal and size-related variation in the diet, consumption rate, and daily ration of mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis) in neritic waters of eastern Australia

Shane P. Griffiths1, Petra M. Kuhnert2, Gary F. Fry1 and Fiona J. Manson1

1 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, PO Box 120, Cleveland, QLD 4163, Australia
2 CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences, PO Box 120, Cleveland, QLD 4163, Australia

Correspondence to S. P. Griffiths: tel: +61 7 3826 7364; fax: +61 7 3826 7222; e-mail: shane.griffiths{at}csiro.au.

Griffiths, S. P., Kuhnert, P. M., Fry, G. F., and Manson, F. J. 2009. Temporal and size-related variation in the diet, consumption rate, and daily ration of mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis) in neritic waters of eastern Australia. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 720–733.

The diet, food consumption, and ration of mackerel tuna (Euthynnus affinis) were studied in Australian neritic waters. Overall, 43 prey taxa were identified from 271 stomachs. The diet was primarily pelagic clupeoids (78% by wet weight, WW; 71% by frequency of occurrence, FO) and demersal fish (19% WW; 32% FO). Multivariate regression tree analysis revealed that temporal differences, followed by fish size, explained most of the variation in the diet composition. Autumn diets differed from those in other seasons because tuna ate virtually only engraulids then. During other seasons, engraulids were still the dominant taxon in the diet, but fish also consumed a greater variety of other prey. Small tuna seemed to target small pelagic crustaceans and teleosts, and medium and large tuna to consume larger pelagic and demersal teleosts. Prey consumption increased with tuna size from 26.42 to 108.03 g d–1 for small and large tuna, respectively. Conversely, daily ration decreased with increasing tuna size from 4.10 to 1.95% body weight per day for medium and large tuna, respectively. Mackerel tuna consumed an estimated 25 036 t year–1 in the study region (170 990 km2). Diet studies are becoming increasingly important in informing ecosystem models, and this study confirmed the need for sampling regimes to capture temporal and size-related variation in diet composition, to maximize the utility of data for use in such models.

Keywords: ecosystem models, kawakawa, multivariate regression trees, pelagic, western Pacific

Received 11 March 2008; accepted 30 November 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.