Skip Navigation


ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil Advance Access originally published online on February 5, 2009
ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2009 66(3):573-581; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsn209
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
66/3/573    most recent
fsn209v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGarvey, R.
Right arrow Articles by Feenstra, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGarvey, R.
Right arrow Articles by Feenstra, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2009 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Published by Oxford Journals. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Estimating mortality from times-at-large: testing accuracy and precision using simulated single tag-recovery data

Richard McGarvey, Janet M. Matthews and John E. Feenstra

SARDI Aquatic Sciences, South Australian Research and Development Institute, West Beach, South Australia 5024, Australia

Correspondence to R. McGarvey: tel: +61 8 8207 5460; fax: +61 8 8207 5481; e-mail: mcgarvey.richard{at}saugov.sa.gov.au

McGarvey, R., Matthews, J. M., and Feenstra, J. F. 2009. Estimating mortality from times-at-large: testing accuracy and precision using simulated single tag-recovery data. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 573–581.

Single tag-recovery data are available for many commercial and recreational fish stocks. However, the use of tag-recovery data has been limited by the unknown proportion of tagged recaptured animals that fishers report back to researchers. Tag underreporting causes underestimation bias in commonly applied Petersen-based estimators of fraction harvested. Using simulated data, we tested the claim that estimates of total instantaneous mortality rate (Z) based on mean time-at-large are unbiased by tag non-reporting, and by short-term (type 1) tag shedding and tag-induced mortality. The Chapman time-at-large estimator produced unbiased estimates of Z. Non-reporting and short-term tag losses produced no detectable bias in estimates of Z. Standard errors of the Chapman Z-estimate decreased with Formula , as predicted. Non-constant-Z scenarios of fishery closure and seasonal cycling gave time-at-large Z-estimates that closely approximated the true population time averages when tag releases were spread evenly across time. Ongoing (type 2) tag shedding and tag-induced mortality biased Z-estimates upwards by the respective ongoing loss rates. When tag-recovery experiments are cut short, accurate estimates of Z are provided by Deemer and Votaw's ‘truncated’ estimator, which had wide standard errors for short experimental length, precision becoming acceptable for tag-recovery experiments run longer than approximately two or three times Z–1.

Keywords: mortality estimation, single tag-recovery data, tag non-reporting, tag shedding, tag-induced mortality, time-at-large

Received 4 April 2008; accepted 15 November 2008; advance access publication 5 February 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.