Making management procedures operational—innovations implemented in South Africa
Marine Resource Assessment and Management Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
Correspondence to É. E. Plagányi: tel: +27 21 6503200; fax: +27 21 6860477; e-mail: eva.plaganyi-lloyd{at}uct.ac.za
Plagányi, É. E., Rademeyer, R. A., Butterworth, D. S., Cunningham, C. L., and Johnston, S. J. 2007. Making management procedures operational — innovations implemented in South Africa. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 626–632.Operational management procedures (OMPs) have become an indispensable fisheries management tool in South Africa in light of their ability to consider the consequences of the main sources of assessment uncertainty. An overview is provided of the MP approaches applied to the major South African fisheries for hake, sardine and anchovy, and west coast rock lobster. As these are among the first OMPs to be implemented worldwide, some for periods longer than 10 y, they provide useful examples of some of the successes and problems encountered with the approach. Particular emphasis is given to some recent innovations and adaptations. These include moves to (i) joint two-species OMPs for the hake and sardine/anchovy resources; (ii) a reference set of weighted operating models for primary testing and tuning in preference to a single model; (iii) consideration of a "research-conditional" approach for hake to allow greater catches in the short term, conditional on research being implemented to resolve a key uncertainty; and (iv) incorporation of some ecosystem considerations by developing appropriate robustness tests (which link with moves towards an ecosystem approach to fisheries). Key lessons gained from experience over the past decade of OMP implementation in South Africa are summarized.
Keywords: management procedure, operating model, operational management procedure applications, research-conditional approach, uncertainty
Received 30 June 2006; accepted 12 January 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Cooke, R. Leaper, and V. Papastavrou Science should not be abandoned in a bid to resolve whaling disputes Biol Lett, October 23, 2009; 5(5): 614 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Butterworth Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 613 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Punt and G. P. Donovan Developing management procedures that are robust to uncertainty: lessons from the International Whaling Commission ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 603 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Rademeyer, E. E. Plaganyi, and D. S. Butterworth Tips and tricks in designing management procedures ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 618 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

