ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil Advance Access originally published online on March 1, 2007
ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2007 64(4):613-617; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsm003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives
Marine Resources Assessment and Management Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
tel: +27 21 6502343; fax: +27 21 6502334; e-mail: doug.butterworth{at}uct.ac.za
Butterworth, D. S. 2007. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 613–617.The origin of the management procedure (MP) approach (sometimes termed management strategy evaluation), with its simulation testing of feedback-control algorithms as a necessary and structured basis for dealing with the inevitable uncertainties associated with fisheries assessments, is briefly reviewed. Also discussed are the advantages that overcome some of the difficulties of the "traditional" approach of coupling an annual "best" assessment to some harvest control rule, such as a failure to consider longer-term trade-offs properly. The MP approach does, however, also have disadvantages, such as the length of time typically required for its development and an argued inflexibility after implementation. Solutions that have been developed to overcome some of these difficulties are discussed.
Keywords: assessment, management procedure, operating model, precautionary approach, risk, simulation testing, trade-offs, uncertainty
Received 30 June 2006; accepted 3 January 2007; advance access publication 1 March 2007.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Cooke, R. Leaper, and V. Papastavrou Science should not be abandoned in a bid to resolve whaling disputes Biol Lett, October 23, 2009; 5(5): 614 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Leaper, D. M. Lavigne, P. Corkeron, and D. W. Johnston Towards a precautionary approach to managing Canada's commercial harp seal hunt ICES J. Mar. Sci., September 25, 2009; (2009) fsp232v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Plaganyi, R. A. Rademeyer, D. S. Butterworth, C. L. Cunningham, and S. J. Johnston Making management procedures operational innovations implemented in South Africa ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 626 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Shelton The weakening role of science in the management of groundfish off the east coast of Canada ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 723 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Pastoors, J. J. Poos, S. B. M. Kraak, and M. A. M. Machiels Validating management simulation models and implications for communicating results to stakeholders ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 818 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

