Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(9):1726-1735; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.06.013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klevjer, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaartvedt, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klevjer, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kaartvedt, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

In situ target strength and behaviour of northern krill (Meganyctiphanes norvegica)

Thor A. Klevjer* and Stein Kaartvedt

University of Oslo, Department of Biology PO Box 1066, Blindern N-0316, Oslo, Norway

*Correspondence to T. A. Klevjer: tel: +47 22856000; fax: +47 22854438. e-mail: t.a.klevjer{at}bio.uio.no.

Target strengths (TS) of individual krill were measured directly in situ. The study focused on scattering layers consisting mainly of krill, using a submerged echosounder to resolve individual krill at their daylight depths. Individuals were tracked for extended periods, and the method was capable of discerning differences in TS and behaviour within seemingly homogenous scattering layers. Krill size increased with depth. This was sometimes, but not always, reflected in TS. The relationship between TS and size broke down when larger krill deeper in the water column were prone to more upward swimming than shallow-living specimens, which reduced TS, but there were also unexplained variations in TS by depth. The variability of TS within the krill tracks was generally high, with deviations routinely exceeding 10 dB, further emphasizing the dependence of krill TS on behaviour. Therefore, although measured values of TS were within the ranges previously reported for krill, it was difficult to apply fixed TS–size relationships. The study underscores the need to determine the impact of behaviour on TS, and shows that appropriate methods to do so are now available.

Keywords: behaviour, krill, target strength, target tracking

Received 8 September 2005; accepted 26 June 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.