Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(9):1695-1704; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.07.002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiao, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nudds, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jiao, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Nudds, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Variation in the catchability of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in the fisheries of Lake Erie using a Bayesian error-in-variable approach

Yan Jiaoa,*, Kevin Reidb and Tom Nuddsc

a Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, VA 24061-0321, USA
b Ontario Commercial Fisheries' Association Box 2129, 45 James Street, Blenheim, ON N0P 1A0, Canada
c Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada

*Correspondence to Y. Jiao: tel: +1 540 2315749; fax: +1 540 2317580. e-mail: yjiao{at}vt.edu.

Catch per unit effort (cpue) from fisheries, and abundance or biomass indices from fishery-independent surveys are often used to infer the dynamics of exploited populations. To do this, cpues and survey indices are usually assumed to be proportional to population size or biomass. Four sources of data on the cpue of yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in Lake Erie were available to evaluate this assumption: commercial gillnet and trapnet fisheries, an angling fishery, and a fishery-independent gillnet survey. The relationships between fisheries cpue and population biomass (estimated from an age-structured model), and between fisheries and survey cpues were analysed by error-in-variable (EIV) models because of the absence of independent estimates of population size. Cpues were not proportional to population size, estimated by biomass. Catchabilities varied widely among fisheries (gear types), time period, and areas (management units) within Lake Erie. A spatial EIV model showed that the migrations among management units were considerable. The whole-lake spatial EIV model showed that cpues were not proportional to population size.

Keywords: Bayesian, catchability, error-in-variable, Lake Erie, yellow perch

Received 15 February 2006; accepted 16 July 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.