Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(9):1640-1648; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.06.009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dicken, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Smale, M.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dicken, M.L.
Right arrow Articles by Smale, M.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Preliminary observations of tag shedding, tag reporting, tag wounds, and tag biofouling for raggedtooth sharks (Carcharias taurus) tagged off the east coast of South Africa

M.L. Dickena,*, A.J. Boothb and M.J. Smalea

a Port Elizabeth Museum PO Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa
b Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa

*Correspondence to M. L. Dicken: tel: +27 41 584 0650; fax: +27 41 584 0661. e-mail: raggedtoothshark{at}bayworld.co.za.

A double-tagging experiment and integrated on-site questionnaire and telephone survey were used to investigate aspects of tag shedding, tag reporting, tag wounds, and tag biofouling for the raggedtooth shark (Carcharias taurus), tagged off the east coast of South Africa. Between 2002 and 2004, 84 juvenile (<1.8 m total length, TL), and 24 adult (>1.8 m TL) C. taurus were double-tagged. Of these, 11 juvenile and six adult double-tagged sharks were recaptured. Significantly, more tags were shed from adult than from juvenile sharks, and there was also a significant difference between the number of anterior and posterior tags shed. Rates of tag reporting were estimated from a survey of 477 randomly selected shore-anglers, and they varied both temporally and spatially from 27% to 100%. In all, 93 tag recaptures were reported in the survey, most (75.3%) with some biofouling. Tag-inflicted damage was reported in 35.5% of recaptured sharks, and the incidence of tag-inflicted damage was greater for disk (77.8%) than for dart tags (25.3%).

Keywords: biofouling, Carcharias taurus, South Africa, tag reporting, tag shedding, tag wound

Received 10 February 2006; accepted 22 June 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.