Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(6):1086-1095; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.03.017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borges, L.
Right arrow Articles by Officer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Borges, L.
Right arrow Articles by Officer, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Modelling discard ogives from Irish demersal fisheries

Lisa Borgesa,*, Alain F. Zuurb, Emer Rogana and Rick Officerc

a Aquaculture and Fisheries Development Centre, Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland
b Highland Statistics Ltd. Newburgh, Scotland, UK
c Southern Fisheries Centre, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries PO Box 76, Deception Bay, Queensland 4508, Australia

*Correspondence to L. Borges: Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, PO Box 68, 1970 AB IJmuiden, The Netherlands; tel: +31 255 564646; fax: +31 255 564644. e-mail: lisa.borges{at}wur.nl.

Annual discard ogives were estimated using generalized additive models (GAMs) for four demersal fish species: whiting, haddock, megrim, and plaice. The analysis was based on data collected on board commercial vessels and at Irish fishing ports from 1995 to 2003. For all species the most important factors influencing annual discard ogives were fleet (combination of gear, fishing ground, and targeted species), mean length of the catch and year, and, for megrim, also minimum landing size. The length at which fish are discarded has increased since 2000 for haddock, whiting, and plaice. In contrast, discarded length has decreased for megrim, accompanying a reduction in minimum landing size in 2000.

Keywords: demersal fisheries, discard ogives, GAM, haddock, megrim, plaice, whiting

Received 1 April 2005; accepted 29 March 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S.-K. Chang, T.-T. Lin, G.-H. Lin, H.-Y. Chang, and C.-L. Hsieh
How to collect verifiable length data on tuna from photographs: an approach for sample vessels
ICES J. Mar. Sci., June 1, 2009; 66(5): 907 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.