Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(5):822-830; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.02.006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hiddink, J.G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, M.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hiddink, J.G.
Right arrow Articles by Kaiser, M.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Predicting the effects of area closures and fishing effort restrictions on the production, biomass, and species richness of benthic invertebrate communities

J.G. Hiddinka,*, T. Huttonb, S. Jenningsb and M.J. Kaisera

a School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL59 5AB, England, UK
b Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft Laboratory Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, England, UK

*Correspondence to J. G. Hiddink: tel: +44 1248 388124; fax: +44 1248 716367. e-mail: j.hiddink{at}bangor.ac.uk.

To effectively implement an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF), managers need to consider the effects of management actions on the fishery and the ecosystem. Methods for assessing the effects on target stocks are generally well developed, but methods for assessing the effects on other components and attributes of the ecosystem are not. Area closures and effort controls are widely used fishery management tools that affect the distribution of fishing effort and may therefore have consequences for a range of species and habitats. An approach is developed to predict the effects of area closures and effort control on the biomass, production, and species richness of benthic communities in the North Sea. The redistribution of beam trawling effort as a result of management action was modelled with a random utility model, assuming that fishers selected fishing grounds on the basis of their knowledge of past catch rates. The effects of trawling on benthic invertebrates were predicted using a size-based model that accounted for differences in habitat among fishing grounds. Our simulations demonstrated that closures of different sizes and in different locations could have positive or negative effects on benthic communities. These predicted effects resulted from the trade-off between recovery in the closed areas and additional trawling effects in the open areas that arose from displaced fishing activity. In the absence of effort controls, closure of lightly fished areas had the strongest positive effect on benthic communities. Effort reduction also had a positive effect. Therefore, area closures in lightly fished areas, coupled with effort reduction, are expected to minimize the effects of fishing on benthic communities. As it was not possible to access full international data for the North Sea beam trawl fleet, the results of the analyses are illustrative rather than complete. Nevertheless, what is demonstrated is an effective approach for assessing the environmental consequences of fishery management action that can be used to inform management decision-making as part of an EAF.

Keywords: beam trawl, disturbance, diversity, ecosystem approach, fisheries management, marine protected areas, marine reserves, production

Received 13 October 2005; accepted 25 February 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
G. Petihakis, C. J. Smith, G. Triantafyllou, G. Sourlantzis, K-N. Papadopoulou, A. Pollani, and G. Korres
Scenario testing of fisheries management strategies using a high resolution ERSEM POM ecosystem model
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2007; 64(9): 1627 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.