Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2006 63(4):677-682; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.11.018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tenningen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tenningen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Lidar target-strength measurements on Northeast Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus)

Eirik Tenningena,*, James H. Churnsideb, Aril Slottea and James J. Wilsonb

a Institute of Marine Research, Nordnesgaten 50, PO Box 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
b National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305, USA

*Correspondence to E. Tenningen: tel: +47 5523 8500; fax: +47 5523 8531. e-mail: eirik.tenningen{at}imr.no.

A linearly polarized green (532 nm) laser and a digital video camera were used to determine the reflectivity (R) and lidar (LIght Detection And Ranging) target strength (TS) of live mackerel by comparison with a standard calibration target. The measured reflectivity was 0.0141 ± 0.0005 when the receiver was copolarized with the laser and 0.0092 ± 0.0004 when the receiver was cross-polarized. The corresponding TS values were –42.66 ± 0.24 dB for the copolarized channel and –44.86 ± 0.23 dB for the cross-polarized channel. The depolarization ratio (depolarized return over total return) of 0.396 is very different from earlier measurements of sardine, suggesting that depolarization might be useful for species identification.

Keywords: lidar, mackerel, polarization, reflectivity, target strength

Received 9 June 2005; accepted 11 November 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. H. Churnside, E. Tenningen, and J. J. Wilson
Comparison of data-processing algorithms for the lidar detection of mackerel in the Norwegian Sea
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1023 - 1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.