Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2005 62(8):1630-1635; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.02.015
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fjälling, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fjälling, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

The estimation of hidden seal-inflicted losses in the Baltic Sea set-trap salmon fisheries

Arne Fjälling*

Swedish National Board of Fisheries, 178 93 Drottningholm, Sweden

*tel: +46 8 6990622; fax: +46 8 6990650. e-mail: arne.fjalling{at}fiskeriverket.se.

A database has been constructed using detailed information on catches and seal-disturbance from contracted commercial fishers in the northern Baltic Sea. A model was developed for the calculation of seal-induced losses in set traps for salmon. The model compared catches on consecutive days or day-pairs. It was found that the total losses in set traps were high: 61% of the potential catch in a trend-adjusted sample of paired data. A significant part of these losses, such as fish wholly removed from gear was hidden. The traditional method of assessing losses by counting the remains of fish underestimated losses by 46%. The scaring effect of seal visits was not included. The model was also used for an analysis of the damage process. There were significant negative after-effects of seal visits on catch levels. It was also found that seal visits co-occur with salmon runs. It seems that seals prefer smaller to larger salmon when raiding traps. It is suggested that the traditional method of estimating losses by counting fish remains should be calibrated when used and that the new model with day-pairs should be tried in analyses of seal interference in other fishing operations.

Keywords: conflict, damage, fishery, grey seal, hidden loss, predation, salmon

Received 22 October 2004; accepted 7 February 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
P. Jounela, P. Suuronen, R.B. Millar, and M-L. Koljonen
Interactions between grey seal (Halichoerus grypus), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), and harvest controls on the salmon fishery in the Gulf of Bothnia
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(5): 936 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
A. Fjalling, M. Wahlberg, and H. Westerberg
Acoustic harassment devices reduce seal interaction in the Baltic salmon-trap, net fishery
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(9): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.