Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2005 62(3):503-510; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bundy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zwanenburg, K. C.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bundy, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zwanenburg, K. C.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Balancing exploitation and conservation of the eastern Scotian Shelf ecosystem: application of a 4D ecosystem exploitation index

Alida Bundya,*, Paul Fanningb and Kees C.T. Zwanenburga

a Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Science Branch PO Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada B2Y 4A2
b Food and Agriculture Organization, Sub-regional Office for the Caribbean PO Box 631-C, Bridgetown, Barbados

*Correspondence to A. Bundy: tel: +1 902 426 8353; fax: +1 902 426 1506. e-mail: bundya{at}mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca.

Few indicators exist that measure the effects of fishing at the whole-ecosystem level. A 4D ecosystem exploitation index is proposed that integrates four measures of ecosystem status: (i) the trophic balance of exploitation, (ii) the intensity of exploitation, (iii) species richness, and (iv) disturbance of the trophic structure. The central concept is that fisheries should extract yield in proportion to the productivity at each trophic level, at sustainable exploitation rates, with minimal disturbance to the trophic structure, and with no loss in species richness. The ecosystem exploitation index is tested on simulated ecosystem data and applied to data from the eastern Scotian Shelf, Canada. The model simulations provided consistent results that should facilitate cross-system comparisons of exploitation and ecosystem status. When applied to actual observations, the results were less coherent, likely attributable to lag effects and environmental impacts. All fisheries likely alter the trophic structure of ecosystems, and the rate and trophic pattern of exploitation determines the level of change. Exploiting all trophic levels equally would always result in less change to trophic structure than top-heavy exploitation. Further testing is required to determine lag effects and sensitivity to various assumptions.

Keywords: disturbance index, ecosystem exploitation index, ecosystem indicator, species richness, trophic balance index, trophic level

Received 1 April 2004; accepted 29 November 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
Y.-J. Shin, L. J. Shannon, A. Bundy, M. Coll, K. Aydin, N. Bez, J. L. Blanchard, M. d. F. Borges, I. Diallo, E. Diaz, et al.
Using indicators for evaluating, comparing, and communicating the ecological status of exploited marine ecosystems. 2. Setting the scene
ICES J. Mar. Sci., February 8, 2010; (2010) fsp294v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P.R. Greenstreet and S. I. Rogers
Indicators of the health of the North Sea fish community: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(4): 573 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.