© 2004 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
Antarctic ecosystem monitoring: quantifying the response of ecosystem indicators to variability in Antarctic krill
British Antarctic Survey, NERC High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England, UK
*Correspondence to K. Reid: tel: +44 1223 221607; fax: +44 01223 221259. e-mail: k.reid{at}bas.ac.uk.
The utility of upper-trophic-level species as ecosystem indicators is determined by our ability to relate changes in indices of their performance to changes at lower trophic levels. Such relationships were assessed using indices of predator performance (response vectors) for four predator species, together with independent ship-based acoustic estimates of abundance of their main prey, Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba), from South Georgia in the South Atlantic Ocean. Out of 32 response vectors investigated, 13 showed a significant non-linear relationship, based on a Holling Type II response, to krill abundance, and just five showed a significant linear relationship. Predator responses reflecting the processes during summer, when prey surveys were undertaken, showed the closest relationship with prey abundance. Distinct relationships existed between the variability of indices and the biological processes they measured. Body mass variables had the lowest variability (CVs <10%), whereas those measuring breeding success showed the greatest variability (CVs >50%). Multivariate indices, produced by combining response vectors from all four predator species into a single combined index, provided a better fit with krill data than any of the individual vectors. Whereas population size parameters for individual species showed no relationship with annual estimates of krill abundance, a combined, multispecies population size index did show a significant response. Understanding the form of the relationship between concurrent indicators of prey abundance and key ecosystem metrics/reference points, such as population size, is crucial to the application of monitoring data to management action.
Keywords: Antarctic, ecosystem monitoring, predator, scale
Received 1 April 2004; accepted 1 November 2004.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K.-H. Kock, K. Reid, J. Croxall, and S. Nicol Fisheries in the Southern Ocean: an ecosystem approach Phil Trans R Soc B, December 29, 2007; 362(1488): 2333 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.J Murphy, J.L Watkins, P.N Trathan, K Reid, M.P Meredith, S.E Thorpe, N.M Johnston, A Clarke, G.A Tarling, M.A Collins, et al. Spatial and temporal operation of the Scotia Sea ecosystem: a review of large-scale links in a krill centred food web Phil Trans R Soc B, January 29, 2007; 362(1477): 113 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|