Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2005 62(2):214-225; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.09.007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piet, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Piet, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Jennings, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Response of potential fish community indicators to fishing

G.J. Pieta,* and S. Jenningsb

a Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Biology and Ecology Haringkade 1, PO Box 68 1970 AB IJmuiden, Netherlands
b Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory Lowestoft NR33 OHT, UK

*Correspondence to G. J. Piet: tel: +31 255 564699; fax: +31 255 564644. e-mail: gerjan.piet{at}wur.nl.

Fish community metrics and diversity indices have often been proposed as indicators to support an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management. The response of eight fish community indicators to spatio-temporal changes in fishing effort was studied by comparing the rate of change in (i) areas subject to different levels (high, medium, and low) of fishing effort and (ii) areas inside and outside a closed area (the plaice box) where management measures led to changes in fishing effort over time. Several indicators showed broadly consistent responses to fishing effort (slope of the biomass-size spectra, mean weight, and mean maximum length) while a range of biodiversity indices and biomass did not. The response of the indicators to spatio-temporal changes in fishing effort showed that, with the exception of the slope of the biomass-size spectra, none of the indicators reliably detected the effects of spatial management measures at the scales of time and space that were used for these analyses. While some of the size-based indicators we tested did provide evidence for fishing impacts on communities, the response of the indicators to fishing was not straightforward and may have depended on environmental conditions and historic fishing regimes. Therefore, the indicators would provide limited support for assessing the effects of short-term and small-scale management actions and must be applied with caution until we have an improved theoretical understanding of their response to fishing and the environment.

Keywords: EcoQO, ecosystem approach, fisheries management, indicators, metrics, plaice box

Received 24 May 2004; accepted 25 September 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. Libralato and C. Solidoro
Comparing methods for building trophic spectra of ecological data
ICES J. Mar. Sci., November 5, 2009; (2009) fsp249v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
G. J. Piet, R. van Hal, and S. P. R. Greenstreet
Modelling the direct impact of bottom trawling on the North Sea fish community to derive estimates of fishing mortality for non-target fish species
ICES J. Mar. Sci., October 1, 2009; 66(9): 1985 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
H. M. Fraser, S. P. R. Greenstreet, and G. J. Piet
Selecting MPAs to conserve groundfish biodiversity: the consequences of failing to account for catchability in survey trawls
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2009; 66(1): 82 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
R. J. D. Wells, J. H. Cowan Jr., and W. F. Patterson III
Habitat use and the effect of shrimp trawling on fish and invertebrate communities over the northern Gulf of Mexico continental shelf
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2008; 65(9): 1610 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P. R. Greenstreet
Biodiversity of North Sea fish: why do the politicians care but marine scientists appear oblivious to this issue?
ICES J. Mar. Sci., November 1, 2008; 65(8): 1515 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
H. M. Fraser, S. P. R. Greenstreet, R. J. Fryer, and G. J. Piet
Mapping spatial variation in demersal fish species diversity and composition in the North Sea: accounting for species- and size-related catchability in survey trawls
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2008; 65(4): 531 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P.R. Greenstreet and S. I. Rogers
Indicators of the health of the North Sea fish community: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(4): 573 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. L. Blanchard, N. K. Dulvy, S. Jennings, J. R. Ellis, J. K. Pinnegar, A. Tidd, and L. T. Kell
Do climate and fishing influence size-based indicators of Celtic Sea fish community structure?
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 405 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.