Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(8):1305-1312; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.08.009
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piet, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Piet, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Rice, J.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks

G.J. Pieta,* and J.C. Riceb

a Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen UR, Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research PO Box 68, 1970 AB, IJmuiden, The Netherlands
b Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 200 Kent Street, Stn 12S015, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OE6, Canada

*Correspondence to G. J. Piet: tel: +31 255 564699; fax: +31 255 564644. e-mail: gerjan.piet{at}wur.nl.

For 17 stocks in the North Sea, the performance and effectiveness of management advice using precautionary reference points was evaluated. Three criteria were used to identify whether a stock was within safe biological limits: SSB < Bpa, F > Fpa, or SSB < Bpa and F > Fpa. Four scenarios were considered, comparing the advice in the assessment year with what is retrospectively (2002 assessment) known to be the status of the stock at that time: (1) stock outside safe biological limits, advice to reduce fishing; (2) stock outside safe biological limits, advice for status quo harvesting; (3) stock within safe biological limits, advice to reduce fishing; and (4) stock within safe biological limits, advice for status quo (or increased) harvesting. Signal Detection Theory was applied to these scenarios, and the proportion of Hits (1 and 4), Misses (2), and False Alarms (3) were determined for each year as the proportion of the stocks for which the respective scenarios applied. Using both Bpa and Fpa was deemed the approach with the lowest error rate, and it resulted in about the same proportion of Hits in management advice as when Bpa alone was used (62%), but the proportion of Misses was slightly lower (24% vs. 26%). Therefore, the suggested EcoQ element would be the proportion of commercial fish stocks within safe biological limits (i.e. SSB > Bpa, F < Fpa), and the Ecological Quality Objective (EcoQO) should be that this EcoQ should be at or above a desired level. This desired level is a societal/political decision relative to the EcoQ reference level (i.e. where the anthropogenic influence on the ecological system is minimal), which by definition is 100%. At present, probably <10% of North Sea fish stocks are within safe biological limits, despite the relatively high Hit rate of >60%. A possible explanation is that most of these stocks (e.g. flatfish and roundfish) are caught in a mixed fishery, for which TAC management is less effective.

Keywords: EcoQO framework, stock assessment, TAC management

Received 20 December 2003; accepted 14 August 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
M.-J. Rochet and J. C. Rice
Simulation-based management strategy evaluation: ignorance disguised as mathematics?
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2009; 66(4): 754 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. C. Rice
A generalization of the three-stage model for advice using the precautionary approach in fisheries, to apply broadly to ecosystem properties and pressures
ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2009; 66(3): 433 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
G. M. Pilling, L. T. Kell, T. Hutton, P. J. Bromley, A. N. Tidd, and L. J. Bolle
Can economic and biological management objectives be achieved by the use of MSY-based reference points? A North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and sole (Solea solea) case study
ICES J. Mar. Sci., September 1, 2008; 65(6): 1069 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. B. M. Kraak, F. C. Buisman, M. Dickey-Collas, J. J. Poos, M. A. Pastoors, J. G. P. Smit, J. A. E. van Oostenbrugge, and N. Daan
The effect of management choices on the sustainability and economic performance of a mixed fishery: a simulation study
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2008; 65(4): 697 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
M. Dickey-Collas, M. A. Pastoors, and O. A. van Keeken
Precisely wrong or vaguely right: simulations of noisy discard data and trends in fishing effort being included in the stock assessment of North Sea plaice
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2007; 64(9): 1641 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. C. Rice and E. Legace
When control rules collide: a comparison of fisheries management reference points and IUCN criteria for assessing risk of extinction
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 718 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. C. Rice and D. Rivard
The dual role of indicators in optimal fisheries management strategies
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 775 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
H.-J. Ratz, E. Bethke, H. Dorner, D. Beare, and J. Groger
Sustainable management of mixed demersal fisheries in the North Sea through fleet-based management a proposal from a biological perspective
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 652 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. C. Rice and M.-J. Rochet
A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 516 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.