© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Species discrimination of fish using frequency-dependent acoustic backscatter
National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Fisheries Science Center F/AKC2, PO Box 15700, 7600 Sand Point Way, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
*Correspondence to E. A. Logerwell: tel: +1 206 526 4231; fax: +1 206 526 6723. e-mail: libby.logerwell{at}noaa.gov.
The difference between mean volume-backscattering strength at 120 and 38 kHz (
MVBS) has been used to discriminate acoustically between macrozooplankton species, and between macrozooplankton and fish or small zooplankton. We examined whether
MVBS could be used to discriminate between juvenile pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and capelin (Mallotus villosus). Acoustic data at 38 and 120 kHz were collected in the Gulf of Alaska during August 2000 and 2001. We selected scattering layers of juvenile pollock and capelin that were sampled directly by midwater trawls. Although we found statistically significant differences at minimum integration thresholds ranging from 85 dB to 69 dB, the greatest difference between
MVBS of juvenile pollock and capelin was observed at the highest integration threshold (69 dB). We also found that, although there was substantial overlap between the frequency distributions of juvenile pollock and capelin
MVBS at the smallest scale of analysis (0.1 nautical mile x 5 m cells), there was virtually no overlap between the
MVBS distributions at the largest scale (
1 nautical mile x 20 m aggregations). We conclude that acoustic differencing at the scale of fish aggregations and at high integration thresholds can be used to distinguish between juvenile pollock and capelin.
Keywords: acoustic survey, capelin, dual frequency, Gulf of Alaska, Mallotus villosus, pollock, Theragra chalcogramma
Received 1 December 2003; accepted 6 April 2004.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Aksland Applying an alternative method of echo-integration ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(8): 1438 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
