Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(5):821-828; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.01.006
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirakihara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shirakihara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kitada, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Estimating migration rates from two tag–release/one recovery experiments

Kunio Shirakiharaa,* and Shuichi Kitadab

a Ocean Research Institute, the University of Tokyo 15-1 Minamidai, Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan
b Tokyo University of Fisheries 4-5-7 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan.

*Correspondence to K. Shirakihara: tel: +81 3 5351 6493; fax: +81 3 5351 6492. e-mail: shirak{at}ori.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

We propose a method for estimating migration (movement) rates from two tag–release/one recovery experiments, regardless of tag-shedding or incomplete tag-reporting which are major problems when tag–recovery techniques are applied to commercially exploitable populations. The entire survey area is divided into multiple strata in advance. The first release is limited to one stratum; then, the second release occurs in every stratum. Recoveries from both releases occur in every stratum. The migration rate between the time of the first and second release is estimated together with its variance. To check the applicability of our method, we applied it to tag–recovery data for skipjack tuna from various places at different times and unequal time intervals. The precision of the estimates was low and the coefficient of variation was 22.6–42.1% because of the small number of recoveries. The experimental design necessary to improve precision is discussed.

Keywords: migration rate, movement, skipjack tuna, tagging experiment

Received 31 July 2003; accepted 5 January 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.