Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(4):501-507; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.03.011
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landry, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Landry, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Microzooplankton production in the oceans

Michael R. Landrya,* and Albert Calbetb

a Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla, CA 92093-0218, USA
b Institut de Ciències del Mar, CMIMA (CSIC) P. Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, ES-08003 Barcelona, Spain

*Correspondence to M. R. Landry: tel: +1 858 534 4702; fax: +1 858 534 6500. e-mail: mlandry{at}ucsd.edu; acalbet{at}icm.csic.es.

A literature synthesis of phytoplankton growth (µ) and grazing (m) rate estimates from dilution experiments reveals that microzooplankton account for most phytoplankton mortality in the oceans, averaging 60–75% of daily phytoplankton production (PP) across a spectrum of open-ocean and coastal systems. For reasonable estimates of gross growth efficiency (GGE=30–40%), such impacts imply that secondary production rates of microzooplankton (MP) are typically in the range 21–34% of PP. However, multiple trophic transfers within the microbial community can further enhance total microzooplankton production by an additional third to a half (MPtot=28–55% of PP). These estimates are 2–5 times typical values for bacterial production (10–15% of PP). Thus, in aggregate and on average, microzooplankton consume substantially more (6–7 times) production from phytoplankton than from heterotrophic bacteria. High grazing impacts and relatively high GGEs are consistent with population growth rates for microzooplankton and phytoplankton that are roughly equivalent under ambient conditions, which may be requisite for grazing regulation. Transfer efficiencies of microzooplankton production to mesozooplankton depend critically on the number of predatory interactions among micro-consumers, and may be one way in which systems differ substantially. Overall, the ability to quantify microzooplankton production in terms of more broadly measured rates of PP provides a potential avenue for broadening our understanding of ocean community dynamics through remote sensing and modelling.

Keywords: grazing, growth, heterotrophic protists, phytoplankton, production


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.