© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Testing candidate indicators to support ecosystem-based management: the power of monitoring surveys to detect temporal trends in fish community metrics
The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, England, UK
*Correspondence to S. Jennings: tel: +44 1502 524363; fax: +44 1502 513 865. e-mail: s.jennings{at}cefas.co.uk.
Community metrics describe aspects of community structure and are often calculated from species-size-abundance data collected during fish stock monitoring surveys. Several community metrics have been proposed as indicators to support ecosystem-based fishery management. These metrics should be sensitive to fishing impacts and respond rapidly to management action, so that managers can assess whether changes in the fish community are a desirable or undesirable response to management. It should also be possible to estimate metrics with sufficient precision so that changes in the community can be detected on management time scales of a year to a few years. Here, we test the power of a large-scale annual trawl survey (North Sea International Bottom Trawl Survey, IBTS) to detect trends in six community metrics: mean length, mean weight, mean maximum length, mean maximum weight, slope of the biomass size spectrum, and mean trophic level. Our analyses show that the power of the trawl survey to detect trends is generally poor. While community metrics do provide good long-term indicators of changes in fish community structure, they are unlikely to provide an appropriate tool to support short-term management decisions. If fish community metrics are to provide effective support for ecosystem-based management, and management time scales cannot be extended, then the power of many surveys to detect trends in fish community structure will need to be improved by increased replication and standardization.
Keywords: community metrics, community structure, ecosystem-based fishery management, indicators, power analysis
Received 23 April 2003; accepted 1 September 2003.
Mike Nicholson died on 6 June 2003, shortly after this paper was submitted. He is greatly missed.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. C. Rice A generalization of the three-stage model for advice using the precautionary approach in fisheries, to apply broadly to ecosystem properties and pressures ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2009; 66(3): 433 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. L. Rees, J. L. Hyland, K. Hylland, C. S. L. Mercer Clarke, J. C. Roff, and S. Ware Environmental indicators: utility in meeting regulatory needs. An overview ICES J. Mar. Sci., November 1, 2008; 65(8): 1381 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-J. Rochet, M. Prigent, J. A. Bertrand, A. Carpentier, F. Coppin, J.-P. Delpech, G. Fontenelle, E. Foucher, K. Mahe, E. Rostiaux, et al. Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers' perceptions and scientific information ICES J. Mar. Sci., September 1, 2008; 65(6): 1057 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. M. Trenkel, M.-J. Rochet, and B. Mesnil From model-based prescriptive advice to indicator-based interactive advice ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 768 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|