Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2004 61(1):140-147; doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.11.002
© 2004 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harbitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pennington, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harbitz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pennington, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Comparison of shortest sailing distance through random and regular sampling points

Alf Harbitza,* and Michael Penningtonb,1

a Institute of Marine Research PO Box 6404, N-9294 Tromsø, Norway
b Institute of Marine Research PO Box 1870, Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway

*Correspondence to A. Harbitz: tel: +47 77609731; fax: +47 77609701. e-mail: alf.harbitz{at}imr.no; michael.pennington{at}imr.no.

1tel: +47 55236309; fax: +47 55238531.

The shortest sailing distance through n sampling points is calculated for simple theoretical sampling domains (square and circle) as well as for a rather irregular and concavely shaped real sampling domain in the Barents Sea. The sampling sites are either located at the nodes of a square grid (regular sampling) or they are randomly distributed. For n less than ten, the exact shortest sailing distance is derived. For larger n, a traveling salesman algorithm (simulated annealing) was applied, and its bias (distance from true minimum) was estimated based on a case where the true minimum distance was known. In general, the average minimum sailing distance based on random sampling was considerably shorter than for regular sampling, and the difference increased with sample size until an asymptotic value was reached at about n=60 for a square domain. For the sampling domain in the Barents Sea used for shrimp (Pandalus borealis) abundance surveys (n=118 stations), the cruise-track lengths based on random sampling were approximately normally distributed. The mean sailing distance was 18% shorter than the cruise track for regular sampling and the standard deviation equalled 2.6%.

Keywords: abundance surveys, random and regular sampling, shrimp, simulated annealing, traveling salesman

Received 20 February 2003; accepted 3 November 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.