Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2003 60(6):1200-1215; doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00143-7
© 2003 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ragnarsson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steingrímsson, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ragnarsson, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steingrímsson, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Spatial distribution of otter trawl effort in Icelandic waters: comparison of measures of effort and implications for benthic community effects of trawling activities

Stefán Áki Ragnarsson* and Sigmar Arnar Steingrímsson

Marine Research Institute Skulagata 4, PO Box 1390, 121, Reykjavik, Iceland

*Correspondence to S. Á. Ragnarsson; tel: +354 5520240; fax: +354 5623790. e-mail: steara{at}hafro.is; web: http://www.hafro.is.

We examined the spatial distribution of trawling effort from logbook data from all Icelandic vessels fishing for demersal fish between 1991 and 1997 with a spatial resolution of 1 degree of latitude and 1 degree of longitude. The trawling effort was widely distributed but was intensive only in small and localised areas. Three measures of effort were compared; tow frequency, tow duration and separate estimates of swept area for otter boards and trawls. In each year, the area swept with otter trawl was 1.7 times greater than the total area in which fishing occurred over the 7 year period. In contrast, the area swept with otter boards was 4% of the total fishing area. Most of the fishing effort was confined to depths shallower than 400 m. With increasing depth, the size of trawls became larger and accordingly, also the area swept per haul. Calculations assuming no variation in the size of the trawl in relation to depth, produced inaccurate swept area estimates. Furthermore, swept area estimates based on depth corrected door spreads were greater than estimates where no such correction was made. Swept area was considered to be a more appropriate measure of effort than tow frequency and tow duration as long as variation in the size of the gear (e.g. in relation to depth) was taken into account. Effort within Icelandic waters was compared in five depth strata within seven zones. Effort was highest off the south and NW coasts and lowest off the north and east coasts. Effort was most intensive at the 100–500 m depth in all zones but in some areas (such as off NW Iceland), effort extended to deeper waters. Knowledge of the distribution of fishing effort is important for predicting larger scale effects of fishing gears on benthic communities.

Keywords: distribution, fishing depth, otter board, otter trawl, swept area, tow duration, tow frequency

Received 21 October 2002; accepted 28 June 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
V. Stelzenmuller, S. I. Rogers, and C. M. Mills
Spatio-temporal patterns of fishing pressure on UK marine landscapes, and their implications for spatial planning and management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., September 1, 2008; 65(6): 1081 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. Solmundsson, J. Palsson, and H. Karlsson
Fidelity of mature Icelandic plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) to spawning and feeding grounds
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(2): 189 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.