Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2003 60(2):304-313; doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00017-1
© 2003 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Godø, O. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Engelhard, G. H
Right arrow Articles by Godø, O. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Age at maturation predicted from routine scale measurements in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus) using discriminant and neural network analyses

Georg H Engelharda,*, Ulf Dieckmannb and Olav Rune Godøa

a Institute of Marine Research PO Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway
b Adaptive Dynamics Network, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria

*Correspondence to G. H. Engelhard; tel: +47 55238643; fax: +47 55238687. e-mail: georg.engelhard{at}imr.no.

We evaluate two methods allowing the prediction of age at maturation from the widths of the annual growth layers in scales (or otoliths) in a case study on Norwegian spring-spawning herring. For this stock, scale measurements have been made routinely for many decades. We compare the performance in classifying age at maturation (at 3, 4,...,9 years) between conventional discriminant analysis (DA) and the new methodology of artificial neural networks (NN) trained by back-propagation against a ‘control’ of historical estimates of age at maturation obtained by visual examination of scales. Both methods show encouraging, and about equally high, classification success. The marginal differences in performance are in favour of DA, if the proportion of correctly classified cases is used as criterion (DA 68.0%, NN 66.6%), but in favour of NN if other criteria are used, including prediction error (error >1 year: DA 5.2%, NN 2.9%), and the average degree of under- or overestimation (underestimation 1.1% of mean with DA; overestimation 0.2% of mean with NN). Evidence is provided that both methods approach the a priori limits to maximal classification success, limits set by overlapping combinations of predictor variables between maturation groups. The methods allow studies on age at maturation in this stock over a very long timespan, including periods well before, during, and after its collapse to commercial extinction. Similar techniques might well be applicable to any other fish stock with long-term data on scale or otolith growth layers.

Keywords: age at maturation, classification, discriminant analysis, growth layers, neural network, Norwegian spring-spawning herring, scale measurements


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
G. H Engelhard and M. Heino
Scale analysis suggests frequent skipping of the second reproductive season in Atlantic herring
Biol Lett, June 22, 2005; 1(2): 172 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.