© 2001 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Effects of in situ target spatial distributions on acoustic density estimates
Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystem Research, University of Michigan and NOAA-Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory 2205 Commonwealth Blvd. Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
Correspondence to J. M. Jech: tel: (508) 495 2353; fax: (508) 4952258; e-mail: michael.jech{at}noaa.gov
One goal of acoustic-based abundance estimates is to accurately preserve spatial distributions of organism density and size within survey data. We simulated spatially-random and spatially-autocorrelated fish density and 
bs distributions to quantify variance in density, abundance, and backscattering cross-sectional area estimates, and to examine the sensitivity of abundance estimates to organism spatial distributions and methods of estimating acoustic size. Our results show that it is difficult to simultaneously estimate fish density and maintain accurate bs-frequency distributions. Among our acoustic backscatter estimation methods, a weighted-mean from a local search window provided optimal estimates of density, abundance and bs. Other methods tended to bias either bs or density estimates. This analysis identifies the relative importance of variance sources when estimating organism density using spatially-indexed acoustic data.
Keywords: density estimates, spatial modeling, underwater acoustics
Received 9 November 1998; accepted 13 November 2000.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. J. Benoit-Bird The effects of scattering-layer composition, animal size, and numerical density on the frequency response of volume backscatter ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2009; 66(3): 582 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|