© 2000 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective
National Marine Fisheries Service Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA. Tel: +01 508-495-2303; fax: +01 508-495-2393; e-mail: Steve.Murawski{at}noaa.gov
Ecosystem considerations may be incorporated into fisheries management by modifying existing overfishing paradigms or by developing new approaches to account for ecosystem structure and function in relation to harvesting. Although existing concepts of overfishing have a strong theoretical basis for evaluating policy choices and much practical use, they do not provide direct guidance on issues such as biodiversity, serial depletion, habitat degradation, and changes in the food web caused by fishing. There is, however, little basis for defining optimum fishing by using related metrics such as diversity indices, slopes of size or diversity spectra, or average trophic level of the catch, and these may produce ambiguous results. If ecosystem-based overfishing concepts are to assume a greater role in management, unambiguous, quantifiable, and predictive measures of ecosystem state and flux must be developed to index: (1) biomass and production by the ecosystem and relationships among its parts, (2) diversity at different levels of organization, (3) patterns of resource variability, and (4) social and economic benefits. Ecosystem considerations do not need to substitute for existing overfishing concepts. Instead, they should be used to evaluate and modify primary management guidance for important fisheries and species. In practice, they emphasize the need to manage fishing capacity, supported by broader use of technical measures such as marine protected areas and gear restrictions.
Keywords: biodiversity, ecosystem overfishing, fisheries management, habitat effects of fishing, serial depletion, trophic impacts of fishing
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. C. Rice A generalization of the three-stage model for advice using the precautionary approach in fisheries, to apply broadly to ecosystem properties and pressures ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2009; 66(3): 433 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kraan, T. Piersma, A. Dekinga, A. Koolhaas, and J. van der Meer Dredging for edible cockles (Cerastoderma edule) on intertidal flats: short-term consequences of fisher patch-choice decisions for target and non-target benthic fauna ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2007; 64(9): 1735 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Campbell and C. Gallagher Assessing the relative effects of fishing on the New Zealand marine environment through risk analysis ICES J. Mar. Sci., March 1, 2007; 64(2): 256 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Garcia and K. L. Cochrane Ecosystem approach to fisheries: a review of implementation guidelines ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 311 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Sosa-Lopez, D. Mouillot, T. Do Chi, and J. Ramos-Miranda Ecological indicators based on fish biomass distribution along trophic levels: an application to the Terminos coastal lagoon, Mexico ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Babcock, E. K. Pikitch, M. K. McAllister, P. Apostolaki, and C. Santora A perspective on the use of spatialized indicators for ecosystem-based fishery management through spatial zoning ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Fulton, A. D.M. Smith, and A. E. Punt Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing? ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 540 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Link Translating ecosystem indicators into decision criteria ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 569 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Tudela, M. Coll, and I. Palomera Developing an operational reference framework for fisheries management on the basis of a two-dimensional index of ecosystem impact ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 585 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.A. Livingston, K. Aydin, J. Boldt, J. Ianelli, and J. Jurado-Molina A framework for ecosystem impacts assessment using an indicator approach ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 592 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Heath Changes in the structure and function of the North Sea fish foodweb, 1973-2000, and the impacts of fishing and climate ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(5): 847 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Heath Regional variability in the trophic requirements of shelf sea fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic, 1973-2000 ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(7): 1233 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Collie, H. Gislason, and M. Vinther Using AMOEBAs to display multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2003; 60(4): 709 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|