Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2000 57(3):628-640; doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0739
© 2000 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caddy, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Caddy, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Marine catchment basin effects versus impacts of fisheries on semi-enclosed seas

J. F. Caddy

FAO, Via delle Terme di Caracalla 00100, Rome, Italy

Synchronous anthropogenic effects on marine coastal systems, particularly since World War II, make it difficult to separate effects of fishing from terrestrial inputs, especially those caused by nutrient runoff. Natural enrichment is vital to productive fisheries, but over the long term anthropogenic nutrient impacts generally predominate over fishery effects in semi-enclosed seas and affect biodiversity and susceptibility to fishing. Such impacts on marine fisheries beyond natural levels of outflow are referred to here as marine catchment basin (MCB) effects. They require coordinated actions within the catchment area to control them, since fisheries management actions alone are unlikely to be effective in rectifying ecosystem impacts. Net nutrient inflows may be positive or negative, depending on intensity and degree of retention by the receiving marine system and may promote ecosystem change and lead to ecological dominance by exotic species. Initially positive effects of enrichment may disguise the urgent need for coordinated environmental and fishery management measures in semi-enclosed seas. Fisheries impacts are serious, but may be secondary and synergistic, but potentially catastrophic under hypoxic conditions since eutrophic processes make demersal ecosystems particularly sensitive to disturbance of bottom habitats. Hence, fishing with bottom gear may impact bottom fauna and demersal resources within or above organic sediments affected by eutrophic processes and hypoxia. These effects show up as changes in the ratio of pelagic to demersal landings, and support broad-brush comparative studies of areas subject to different levels of environmental impact.

Keywords: anthropogenic effects, ecosystem impacts on fishing, (European) semi-enclosed seas, marine eutrophication, nutrients



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PALAIOSHome page
R. LOCKWOOD and L. R. CHASTANT
QUANTIFYING TAPHONOMIC BIAS OF COMPOSITIONAL FIDELITY, SPECIES RICHNESS, AND RANK ABUNDANCE IN MOLLUSCAN DEATH ASSEMBLAGES FROM THE UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY
Palaios, August 1, 2006; 21(4): 376 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
E. A. Fulton, A. D.M. Smith, and A. E. Punt
Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing?
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 540 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.