Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 2000 57(3):468-475; doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0741
© 2000 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gislason, H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Boyle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gislason, H.
Right arrow Articles by O'Boyle, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Symposium overview: incorporating ecosystem objectives within fisheries management

Henrik Gislason, Michael Sinclair, Keith Sainsbury and Robert O'Boyle

University of Copenhagen, c/o Danish Institute for Fisheries Research Charlottenlund Castle, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford Institute of Oceanography PO Box 1006, Dartmouth, NS, Canada B2Y 4A2
Division of Marine Research, CSIRO GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia

Tel: +902 426-3492; e-mail: Sinclairm{at}mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca

Following an introduction to the broader context of the Symposium, the scope of the oral presentations is summarized under three themes: a global synthesis of fisheries impacts in different ecosystems; an overview of the methods available for quantifying ecosystem impacts; and the integration of fisheries and environmental management. The presentations generated substantial evidence that marine ecosystems have been impacted by fishing. Also there appeared to be a broad consensus that the present approach to achieving conservation objectives of fisheries management does not sufficiently take into account ecosystem considerations. There was not, however, a consensus on what additional restrictions are required, or on what features of ecosystems need to be protected. A way forward is to add ecosystem objectives to the conservation component of fisheries management plans, as well as to the management plans for other ocean-use sectors. The aggregate ocean-use activities would need to be evaluated in a nested manner, at a range of geographic scales, in relation to the more broadly defined conservation objectives. It is suggested that the geographic scales for evaluation of ecosystem considerations could be defined in a pragmatic manner based on the somewhat artificial boundaries of political and administrative systems already in place. The six conservation objectives proposed are maintenance of (1) ecosystem diversity, (2) species diversity, (3) genetic variability within species, (4) directly impacted species, (5) ecologically dependent species, and (6) trophic level balance. Indicators for each objective are discussed, as well as reference points that would trigger management actions. Such a broadening of conservation objectives for fisheries mangement would require both enhanced monitoring and a greater workload added to the process of provision of scientific advice through peer review. Of equal importance would be the challenges of establishing a governance framework to address multiple uses of marine resources. The spirit of the Symposium was that these coupled scientific and governance challenges will be very stimulating.

Keywords: ecosystem impacts, fisheries management


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P. R. Greenstreet, G. J. Holland, T. W. K. Fraser, and V. J. Allen
Modelling demersal fishing effort based on landings and days absence from port, to generate indicators of "activity"
ICES J. Mar. Sci., June 1, 2009; 66(5): 886 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. C. Rice
A generalization of the three-stage model for advice using the precautionary approach in fisheries, to apply broadly to ecosystem properties and pressures
ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2009; 66(3): 433 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
D. Yemane, Y.-J. Shin, and J. G. Field
Exploring the effect of Marine Protected Areas on the dynamics of fish communities in the southern Benguela: an individual-based modelling approach
ICES J. Mar. Sci., March 1, 2009; 66(2): 378 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
H. M. Fraser, S. P. R. Greenstreet, and G. J. Piet
Selecting MPAs to conserve groundfish biodiversity: the consequences of failing to account for catchability in survey trawls
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2009; 66(1): 82 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P. R. Greenstreet, H. M. Fraser, and G. J. Piet
Using MPAs to address regional-scale ecological objectives in the North Sea: modelling the effects of fishing effort displacement
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2009; 66(1): 90 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
C. J. Smith, A. C. Banks, and K-N. Papadopoulou
Improving the quantitative estimation of trawling impacts from sidescan-sonar and underwater-video imagery
ICES J. Mar. Sci., December 1, 2007; 64(9): 1692 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
L. T. Kell, I. Mosqueira, P. Grosjean, J-M. Fromentin, D. Garcia, R. Hillary, E. Jardim, S. Mardle, M. A. Pastoors, J. J. Poos, et al.
FLR: an open-source framework for the evaluation and development of management strategies
ICES J. Mar. Sci., May 1, 2007; 64(4): 640 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
S. P.R. Greenstreet and S. I. Rogers
Indicators of the health of the North Sea fish community: identifying reference levels for an ecosystem approach to management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(4): 573 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
P. M. Cury and V. Christensen
Quantitative ecosystem indicators for fisheries management
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 307 - 310.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
F. J. Mueter and B. A. Megrey
Distribution of population-based indicators across multiple taxa to assess the status of Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea groundfish communities
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 344 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
P. Freon, L. Drapeau, J. H.M. David, A. Fernandez Moreno, R. W. Leslie, W. H. Oosthuizen, L. J. Shannon, and C. D. van der Lingen
Spatialized ecosystem indicators in the southern Benguela
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 459 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
E. A. Babcock, E. K. Pikitch, M. K. McAllister, P. Apostolaki, and C. Santora
A perspective on the use of spatialized indicators for ecosystem-based fishery management through spatial zoning
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 469 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
P.A. Livingston, K. Aydin, J. Boldt, J. Ianelli, and J. Jurado-Molina
A framework for ecosystem impacts assessment using an indicator approach
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(3): 592 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.