© 1996 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
Which are better, random or systematic acoustic surveys? A simulation using North Sea herring as an example
SOAFD Marine Laboratory PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB, U.K
This paper considers the design of acoustic surveys for estimating the mean abundance of spatially correlated populations. We examined how the choice of survey design affects the bias and precision of the sample mean as an estimator of mean abundance. Further, we investigated three different ways of estimating the error variance of the sample mean: the pooled within strata variance and two geostatistical variance estimators based on spherical and exponential models. First, we analysed four surveys to determine the spatial structure of the North Sea herring population. We developed forty different population models based on the observed amplitude and spatial distribution. We generated 1000 realizations of each model, each comprising 4000 potential transect means. Each realization was sub-sampled using eight different sampling strategies. From each realization and sampling strategy, we calculated the sample mean and three estimates of the variance of the sample mean.
The simulations show that, for surfaces with local positive correlation, more precise estimates of the surface mean can be obtained using stratified random or systematic sampling than simple random sampling. The best strategy considered here was (a) a systematic survey with a geostatistical variance estimator, when the main objective is to obtain the most precise estimator of abundance, (b) a stratified random survey, with two transects per strata, and a pooled variance estimator, when an important objective of the survey is to obtain a good estimate of the variance of the abundance estimator.
Keywords: acoustic surveys, abundance estimation, survey strategy, surveys, variance estimation
Received 10 March 1994; accepted 17 May 1995.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Liu, Y. Chen, and J. Cheng A comparative study of optimization methods and conventional methods for sampling design in fishery-independent surveys ICES J. Mar. Sci., October 1, 2009; 66(9): 1873 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Simmonds, M. Gutierrez, A. Chipollini, F. Gerlotto, M. Woillez, and A. Bertrand Optimizing the design of acoustic surveys of Peruvian anchoveta ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2009; 66(6): 1341 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Adams, B. P. Harris, and K. D. E. Stokesbury Geostatistical comparison of two independent video surveys of sea scallop abundance in the Elephant Trunk Closed Area, USA ICES J. Mar. Sci., September 1, 2008; 65(6): 995 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Walline Geostatistical simulations of eastern Bering Sea walleye pollock spatial distributions, to estimate sampling precision ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2007; 64(3): 559 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
