Skip Navigation

ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 1996 53(1):11-21; doi:10.1006/jmsc.1996.0002
© 1996 by ICES/CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea/Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The diet of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus L.) in the Barents Sea during the period 1984–1991

W. Jiang and T. Jørgensen

Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute 106, Nanjing Road, Qingdao 266071, P. R. China
Department of Fisheries and Marine Biology, University of Bergen HiB, 5020 Bergen, Norway

An analysis of the diet of haddock in the Barents Sea based on 9500 stomachs collected between 1984 and 1991 is presented. The analysis was made on a quarterly basis for 10 cm fish length-classes. An overall 27% of the stomachs collected were empty and the average wet weight of the stomach contents was low for all size-classes (generally <10 g). By weight the prey categories Crustacea and Echinodermata made up an overall 60% of the diet, and fishes 20%. The ontogenetic change in the diet was small for haddock larger than 20 cm. Confidence limits for the estimated mean weight percentages were calculated using both theoretical variance estimators and bootstrapping. Precision was generally poor, with coefficients of variation typically in the range 0.4–0.6.

Keywords: haddock, diet composition, confidence estimates

Received 24 January 1994; accepted 16 May 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.